R/C Aero
Search Engine>>>

Welcome to RC AERO

On R/C AERO

HOME

Kit Reviews:
Plan Reviews:
Pylon:
Scale:
Sports:
Video:

Events Calendar:
R/C Power
R/C Gliders

Pylon:
Sale State Champs 2000
20Lap Sports Pylon 1998
20Lap Sports Pylon 1999
20Lap Sports Pylon 2000
VMAA Trophy 1999

Sports:
My Models
RCM X-Pert

Events:
20Lap Sports Pylon 1998
20Lap Sports Pylon 1999
20Lap Sports Pylon 2000
VMAA Trophy 1999

General:
Construction Reviews
Discussion Forums
Mid-Air Collisions
Model Links
Article Contributions

Contributors
Sponsors

Also By SCAD

Full Size Aviation  
JW Swing Orchestra

Also produced by
John Schmidli
for CER Technology
CER Technology
Ardus Consulting


Developed
by


Please visit our major sponsor
 

DeHavilland DH-88 Comet


FLYING

Radio control setup inside the fuselage plus the air bottle for retracts.With no experience in flying a twin engined model, I waited for a calm day with the wind straight down the strip so at least the weather wouldn't be an unknown factor.

I spent some time tuning the engines one at a time utilising a tacho for accuracy.

The model was originally built to scale with a tailskid but I later changed it to a tailwheel to improve the ground handling under power.

The moment of truth had arrived!

With engines tuned, all controls adjusted and the retracts checked, I had finally run out of excuses.

The model stood ready at the end of the strip. It was time to fly!

I opened the throttles gradually and the model tracked fairly well.

Side mounted engines become invisible in flight against deep engine nacelle profiles.I figured with a wing section the shape this aircraft has, I should get as much ground speed as possible to avoid possible tip stalls which are notorious on highly tapered wings with high wing loadings.

With the model gaining speed, I opened the throttles and we were instantly airborne. No tip stalls, but the most obvious difference to all models I have flown before was that this one is a racer.

At full throttle, this plane lives up to its heritage - a very fast model.

After settling into flying, the Comet seemed to fly very well so I gained some height to check the stall properties. With the throttle idled and the elevator stick coming back, once again I thought, itŐs not a trainer, so slowing it down to land could be interesting.

The stall was very definite and the wing did drop dramatically. Recovery was predictable but exponential function of about 25/35% is a help to avoid snap rolls. Flyers beware!

The very sleek lines of this brightly coloured aircraft undoubtedly captures the imagination of onlookers.After many fast and slow flybys with the wheels up, I thought it may be a good idea to land before I ran out of fuel.

The way I had the flaps set up meant I could only get about 50 degrees. The flaps actually seemed to hold the nose of the model up and slow it down quite well.

Next as I throttled back to about 50% and put the wheels down, it still seemed fairly quick.

With the model on final approach at about 25% power with the flaps down, it was looking good.

I had to keep the power on to maintain a good approach. Once over the threshold, I idled the motors and flared it out for a smooth mains landing.

In later flights, rolls and low flybys were about my limit and the model has survived one engine failure. With the engine stopped it is a handful - I needed all opposite rudder and aileron trim and the model crabbed its way back to the strip.

Not dissimilar to the real thing!

Page1
Page2
Page3
Page4
Page5 (next)

Construction Review Index


This page was last
updated on: 02-Jun-02
Site Optimized to be viewed at 800x600 pixels or greater
on Internet Explorer 4.0 & Netscape 4.xx
Copyright © 2001 SCHMIDLI Creation & Design
All rights reserved
Site Developed by SCHMIDLI Creation & Design
Web Master: John Schmidli